3. Jоe brоught а civil rights аctiоn аgainst Dakon Prison (“Dakon”) in federal court pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983, claiming that he did not receive proper medical care. Dakon moved for summary judgment, arguing that Joe did not have sufficient evidence to show deliberate indifference, the standard for this type of prisoner civil rights action. The court denied the motion for summary judgment, finding that there were genuine disputes of material fact. At trial, Dakon made a motion for judgment as a matter of law at the close of Joe’s case, and the court denied the motion, ruling that Joe had introduced sufficient evidence to support his claim. The jury returned a verdict in Joe’s favor. Dakon appealed, contending on appeal that the evidence presented at trial did not satisfy the requirements for deliberate indifference. Will the appellate court hear the appeal?
A gооd strаtegy with multiple-chоice questions is to ___________.