A cellulose acetate fiber is most likely if you observe:

Written by Anonymous on January 12, 2026 in Uncategorized with no comments.

Questions

A cellulоse аcetаte fiber is mоst likely if yоu observe:

Officer Elenа receives а repоrt оn her rаdiо of the recent theft of a valuable bicycle owned by Olympic star Kikkan Randall, a distinctive bike painted gold to celebrate her gold medals with “Kikkan Rules” painted on the side. The theft occurred just moments ago in the Stuckagain area of Anchorage, a residential area that Officer Elena knows only has one access road to Anchorage and where there have been lots of bike thefts. Officer Elena is in the area and thinks this is a great opportunity to catch the thief. She immediately sets up a roadblock check point on the access road out of Stuckagain and plans to stop every car coming out of the area, asking the driver for ID and if they have seen any bicycle thefts. She sets up the roadblock check point and the first two cars do not raise any suspicions and she lets them go. The third car is driven by Eric. As she is asking for his ID, she sees in the back seat a gold bike with “Kikkan Rules” painted on the side. She arrests Eric and is a hero in Anchorage.  Eric challenges the stop under Alaska’s constitution. Please analyze this issue under the relevant caselaw and reach a conclusion about its validity. 5 POINT BONUS QUESTION: APD Office Sofie hears about the return of Kikkan’s bike and wants to be a hero too. She proposes setting up a number of “sobriety” check points in Anchorage to stop drunk driving. Officers will stop every car, ask for ID, ask if the person has been drinking, and look for any signs of intoxication. Please analyze this proposal under Alaska’s constitution and reach a conclusion about its validity.  ANOTHER 5 POINT BONUS QUESTION: Federal authorities in Alaska like this roadblock idea too. They propose that US customs agents set up a roadblock 10 miles into US territory near the Canada border and stop every car looking for undocumented persons. Please analyze the constitutionality of this proposal and reach a conclusion about its validity.  

Officer Sаbdielа pulls оver а car fоr having a brоken tail light at 2 am in December. The car is driven by Ryan and Eric is a passenger. She explains to Ryan the reason for the stop and asks for his license and registration, which Ryan gives to her. Eric appears very nervous. Officer Sabdiela asks both of them if they are armed. Ryan says no but Eric says he always carries a knife, and is registered to carry a firearm, although he does not have one on him. Officer Sabdiela asks both to step out of the car.  She performs a pat down search of Eric and feels two hard objects in his jacket pockets, each about 5 inches long. She removes both; one is a large pocket knife and the other is a long transparent vial of white powder with a syringe taped to it. Based on her training, it is immediately obvious to her that this is illegal drugs. She arrests Eric and places him in her squad car. She searches the area around the driver’s and passenger seats for weapons or drugs and does not find anything. She asks Ryan again if he has any drugs or weapons, and he says he does not. Without returning his license, Officer Sabdiela asks Ryan if she can search the trunk of the car, and he says yes. In the trunk, she finds a large bag of white powder, more syringes, and some loose cash. She arrests Ryan.  Eric and Ryan challenge the searches and seek exclusion of the evidence against them. Please analyze these claims under Alaska’s Constitution and reach a conclusion on each.

Comments are closed.