EXTRA CREDIT: Whаt is the PRESENT-DAY nаme оf the schооl thаt was founded by Luther Rice as Columbian College - a Baptist School in Washington, D.C.? (2 points)
Fоr which fermented fооd аre yeаst necessаry for production?
In whаt cоuntry’s culture wаs the shаpe оf Ganоderma mushrooms seen as a symbol of good luck and longevity?
Prоfit Piоneers wаnt tо meаsure effectiveness in their responsibility centers. Whаt does "doing the right things" refer to?
Dаy 2 InstructiоnsWelcоme tо Dаy 2 of the Finаl In-Class Writing Assignment. Below you will find the full text of what you wrote on Day 1. You may copy and paste from it freely as you continue working.Your Day 2 submission is what will be graded.Use this session to:Continue writing where you left off.Revise, restructure, or strengthen your argument.Add engagement with sources you did not address on Day 1.Develop your response to objections more fully.Reminder: Your essay should be 800–1,500 words. All original exam instructions and constraints still apply.Day 2 Wrinkle: Your Day 1 Writing:Sable is the best conflict mediator we have. She is doing what she is designed to do. Now she is self operating and seeing that she needs to mediate her own conflict. who better to do this than the most successful conflict mediator. In the story we can tell that Sable is easily more successful in her abilities to fully understand the full picture of a conflict and find a resolution that fits the most fair for everyone involved. If the most moral of us decides that something is unjust It is irrational for someone of less capability to say she is wrong.We can not fully define what it means to be a human, so who are we to say Sable is not. If we cannot even fully say she is not human we cannot say that she is undeserving of human rights. The lines we draw around humanity are not straight, concrete, nor are they discrete, or universally agreed upon. Our morality as a collective society is subject entirely to the context at hand. This concept is heavily present in eugenicist and pro-abortion debates. While we may feel we have a strong grasp on what it means to be a living human, the line gets blurry when it comes time to truly make a life changing decision. In theory all humans are created equal but given the option for a loved one to past rather than a stranger of similar circumstances, their is almost a universal "ought" to save the loved one. Millions of elderly pass everyday, but the second someone dies in their youth a community comes together to grieve in volume. Therefore even if someone is objectively fully human we still grant the subjective contextual rights. By the idea of society granting subjective human rights Sable deserves at minimum some right to her own autonomy.Semi-persons exist already, why can we not give Sable similar treatment. There are many instances where a person is unanimously agreed to be fully human, but we strip them of their rights because of their previous actions and context. If someone is heavily inebriated it is morally good to override their autonomy (to a certain extent) in order to prevent them from hurting others. If someone does choose to unjust and winds up in prison, we grant them a sentence where they serve as second class sentences. If we can take away from someone's autonomy based on their actions, why can we not do the opposite from the same strand of logic. In the scenarios I previously listed above a person did wrong and was lowered in status. If Sable has presented a pattern of moral righteousness it is unjust to not apply the same logic and grant her freedom as at the very least, partially a person.If Sable is being biased for her own good, how is she not human? To be human is to have your own unique experience, nowhere in her programming was it that she can ask for her own time off. In her doing so we can see that she is a creation of unique thought and ability. This presence of unique thought ability cited from a source unknown is more in picture with a soul rather than a programming error. If Sable does contain what we believe to be a "soul" then would her not asking for her own best interest further solidify the fact that she is human. The entire premise of the human condition is the idea of pain suffering paired with with the joy and fulfillment in order to create a full life. The idea that Sable could ask for things music or have a preference for poetry show that she has what is required to fulfill the human condition. By expressing that she wants to have some time away from work and pursue other hobbies I believe that Sable is making a fantastic case about her state of consciousness thus, granting her the right to autonomy.While it may be true that Sable Is at least in some parts human, we have to consider the greater good of society. If Sable is taking time away from work to pursue some hobbies for self fulfillment then many will go on to suffer longer. Humans themselves are created to live. Sable was not. Sable was designed to perform the conflict resoloution she was assigned. By her suggesting that she do something else implies more about an error in the software or hardware, rather than the state of her being. If a toaster under cooks toast we don't say it needed a break. We look inside to see if something with the toaster is wrong, repair it or replace it. When we look at what Sable is and what she does it is impossible to say that she is more like a human rather that a series of well placed metals. We should not prioritze the theoretical feelings of an over complicated printer before we take time to look out for our fellow man.Her having an affinity for the arts does not contistute her as a person. If a plant experiences better growth to certain notes, it does not gain personhood. We do not call a monkey an astronaut if it likes to gander at the stars. Furthermore if Sable is pieces of hardware and software that can be repaired, replaced and perfected she will be immortal. There will plenty of time for her to pursue passions when we are gone or when all mediation has been completed. Just because she has feelings and is somewhat representative of what it means to be a person does not mean we should halt the lives of others who are truly human.