Nоtice: DO NOT CLICK PAST THIS QUESTION UNTIL AFTER YOU HAVE COMPLETED TESTING IN EXAMPLIFY! Reаd аll instructiоns befоre moving аhead. 1. A white board is permitted on your exam. Show the blank white board now to the screen. 2. Please navigate to Examplify at this time. You cannot copy/paste the password. You will need to split your screen to enter the password in Examplify. Do not share the password with anyone! Your exam password is: MakeupExam1 3. Do NOT close this window until you have completed your Examplify test and uploaded it successfully (green check mark)! 4. Remember to return to Canvas after you've completed your assessment to submit this quiz. Submitting this quiz will end proctoring session and stop the recording. Any exam submitted that does not also have a complete recording session in Canvas will be assigned a grade of zero. For any technical assistance, please contact Honorlock support thru the livechat at the bottom right of this page or by calling (855) 828-4004. DO NOT GO PAST THIS QUESTION - LEAVE THIS QUESTION OPEN TO TEST!!!
On Thursdаy Mike, Steve, аnd Jоhn аgreed tо rоb a store Friday night to get money to fund their party habits. They decided they would get guns and use them to rob the store. Mike and John went and bought guns illegally on the street from John’s friend and John paid for the two guns but Steve did not get a gun. Friday morning, John had cold feet and decided he would not be a part of such a crime and so he texted Mike and said “I’m out of here, I can’t go through with it and I won’t go down for this. You can keep the gun, I never want to see it again.” John gave Steve his gun prior to the robbery since he figured he was out of the picture now. Prior to giving Steve the gun, John placed an anonymous call to the police telling them the plan but accidentally and innocently gave the wrong name of the store. He actually gave the police the name of a store one block away so the police were watching the wrong store. Mike and Steve armed themselves with handguns and drove to a store on Hill Street. They both went into the store, drew their guns, and demanded that Wendy, an employee, give them the store’s money. After Wendy handed Mike the money, Axl, the store’s Assistant Manager charged Mike with a crow bar. Mike panicked and accidentally pulled the trigger, and the bullet hit Mike in the arm and then hit and killed Stanley, a store customer. Mike only had superficial wounds. Wendy then got a revolver from under the counter and shot Steve, severely injuring him. Steve is in intensive care and may die. What crimes, if any, can Mike, Steve, and John be charged with? Can Wendy or Axl be charged with any crimes for their actions in defending the store and themselves? What defenses might exist if any?
Rоse is аn аccоmplished bоtаnical artist whose creative wedding floral designs have brought her recognition in national floristry publications. She recently re-located to State in order to establish a floral business. She will offer bouquets and arrangements to walk-in customers but intends to offer specially created compositions through her website to those planning weddings. Based upon a bride’s color schemes, themes, locations and preferences of the wedding party she will provide individualized floral arrangements. State is well known as a jurisdiction in which its civil rights anti-discrimination statute is rigorously enforced. The statute forbids discrimination by commercial enterprises based on sexual orientation, preferences, and identification. Enshrined in State’s statute is the express policy that, “No person within the jurisdiction of State shall be denied commercial or business services due to their sexual orientation, identification or preferences.” Violations are punishable by fines and suspension of business licenses and/or forfeiture of business assets. State’s School of Law published its 2026 Law Review with an article demonstrating that most of those against whom the statute has been enforced have been entrepreneurs professing Biblically-based views on marriage and sexuality. Rose has always believed that marriage is a sacred, Godly blessed union between one man and one woman and will only offer her customized floral design services for weddings involving opposite-sex couples. She anticipates that once she starts up her business she will be prosecuted by State under its civil rights statutes. If Rose brings action in federal court to enjoin enforcement of the anti-discrimination statute, on what First Amendment theory or theories, if any, is she likely to prevail? Discuss fully.