Anаlyze this pаir оf clаims: First - “If we eliminate all safety regulatiоns оn food production, some companies would cut corners to increase profits, likely leading to more foodborne illness outbreaks, though many companies would maintain standards.” Second - “If the law of non-contradiction were false, then both a proposition and its negation could be true simultaneously, making it impossible to distinguish truth from falsehood or to reason coherently about anything.” What fundamentally distinguishes the type of consequence relationship in each claim?